forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Brondsema <d...@brondsema.net>
Subject Re: REsizing batik to a minimum for us.
Date Thu, 27 May 2004 14:05:33 GMT

I think we should hold off on significant changes until after we release
0.6.  We don't want to break anything now :-)  A difference of .6 MB is
not worth risking it.

And a full test suite would be immensely helpful when we do do this.

Dave Brondsema

On Thu, 27 May 2004, Juan Jose Pablos wrote:

> Looking at the size of forrest. Batik use more disk space than any other
>   librarie. So I found out the dependencies for the individual batik jar:
>
>
> http://xml.apache.org/batik/install.html#optionalComponents
>
>
> So this is my list of jar as the alternative to use batik-all-1.5.1.jar
> that uses 2456 Kb.
>
>
> 356     batik-awt-util.jar
> 252     batik-bridge.jar
> 232     batik-css.jar
> 84      batik-dom.jar
> 80      batik-ext.jar
> 152     batik-gvt.jar
> 40      batik-parser.jar
> 36      batik-script.jar
> 384     batik-svg-dom.jar
> 68      batik-transcoder.jar
> 84      batik-util.jar
> 24      batik-xml.jar
>
> So in total is 1792 Kb.
>
>
> So I commit this change?
>
> Cheers,
> Cheche
>

-- 
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
http://csx.calvin.edu : student org

Mime
View raw message