forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <rgard...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Quarterly Report
Date Wed, 12 May 2004 13:39:41 GMT
Ross Gardler wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
>> Having committers that are not PMC members would be a new thing to do, 
>> and we will have to discuss if/how to do it.
> 

<snip/>

> I suppose my real concern is, do we have enough people that do want to 
> be on the PMC that will be consistently active there? If I understand 
> the implications of the above quote correctly, other TLP's *requrie* 
> people to be active on the PMC in order to be a committer. If we allow 
> people to be committers but not PMC members will we still have enough 
> active PMC members as we grow (more committers means more oversite work 
> for the PMC).

OK so another post pointed out that this is how it works over at Cocoon. 
However, my concerns still stand. Cocoon is a very active project, with 
many consistently active developers. The same cannot be said for Forrest.

Ross


Mime
View raw message