forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carlos Araya" <car...@cvc.edu>
Subject Re: REsizing batik to a minimum for us.
Date Thu, 27 May 2004 16:51:29 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Juan Jose:

Breaking a tool that has been in use is not a significant change? I
think it is because people  know to expect this and then suddenly we
tell them: no it's no longer available, deal with it, and don't
provide an alternative

One user has already replied that this is a functionality that they
need.

I don't think eliminating functionality is the way to clean up the
jar mess you refer to

Carlosc
- - ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Juan Jose Pablos" <cheche@che-che.com>
To: <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 07:22
Subject: Re: REsizing batik to a minimum for us.


> Dave Brondsema escribió:
> > I think we should hold off on significant changes until after we
> > release 0.6.  We don't want to break anything now :-)  A
> > difference of .6 MB is not worth risking it.
> >
> > And a full test suite would be immensely helpful when we do do
> > this.
> >
>
> But dave, this is not a significant change. This will impact
> producing  png out of svg. I have test it already so I can build
> the fresh-site.
>
> In the case of failure, the java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError should
> appear.
>
> I would like to clean this jar mess that we have got here before we
release.c

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBQLYci11sel0NpjckEQIdLACeNMoFRQIcIXhwWVWuSiOE/eN/o98AoIky
6LJE9+xnD+t6i8mvJDtqIFvA
=Cno9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Mime
View raw message