forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brian S. Hayes" <>
Subject [Proposal] Forrest Signature in HTML source WAS: Possible Live site??
Date Fri, 28 May 2004 21:07:36 GMT
I apologize if this has been discussed before...

After I saw the email below, I thought, "I should be able to view the HTML
source for a website to see if it was created using Forrest."  Well, at the
site below, there was nothing to in the HTML source to indicate Forrest.
The same goes for the Forrest home page at

My proposal is that we have some appropriate meta elements and comments
placed in the generated HTML files.  For example, MS Word puts the following
in HTML files:
  <meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
  <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10">
  <meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 10">

With Google and a mechanism such as this you can get a quick idea of how
many sites (or web pages) are generated using Forrest.
A Google search of "<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10">" turns
up 6,000+ hits.

I'm sure follow-on discussion will determine exactly what is appropriate.
However, is the idea a good one?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Lane []
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 4:22 PM
> To:
> Cc:
> Subject: Possible Live site??
> Hi there list[s],
> The other night I got a mail shot from formsPlayer, I must have handed
> over my details at some point ;) Anyway I went to their site:
> It really looks like a Cocoon / Forrest site (actually I think it's
> Forrest, the html comments style and general design style gives it
> away?), anyway I looked on the apache site briefly, both on Cocoon &
> Forrest and couldn't see it listed. Is this a Cocoon / Forrest site?
> If it is it should be listed in either Cocoon or Forrest, it's a nice
> site.
> If you already know about this please ignore.
> Jason Lane
> Developer
> Root10 developments

View raw message