Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43605 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2004 09:46:03 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2004 09:46:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 39155 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2004 09:45:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 39008 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2004 09:45:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 38985 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2004 09:45:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fep21-app.kolumbus.fi) (193.229.0.48) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2004 09:45:34 -0000 Received: from [80.186.85.234] by fep21-app.kolumbus.fi with ESMTP id <20040427094547.QYBP19565.fep21-app.kolumbus.fi@[80.186.85.234]> for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:45:47 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) In-Reply-To: <1082991038.408d21be5c006@secure.solidusdesign.com> References: <1082991038.408d21be5c006@secure.solidusdesign.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sjur_N=F8rsteb=F8_Moshagen?= Subject: Re: [vote] freeze for release Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:45:48 +0300 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N P=E5 26. apr. 2004 kl. 17.50 skrev Dave Brondsema: > > As mentioned on some earlier threads, we should do a release soon. I=20= > propose we > put a freeze on new development, finish existing work, and make a=20 > release. > > Here's what I'm aware of for existing work that needs to be finished: > copyless branch > forrestbot2 deploy.cvs > move forrestbot2 into main > check all outstanding bugs in JIRA > > Then after the release we can start working on some significant=20 > changes: > Nicola's promising (but backwards-compatiblity breaking) ideas for=20 > skinconf.xml > xhtml2 > i18n > etc. I'm eagerly looking forward to Upayavira's work on i18n, and would like=20= it to be included in the next release rather than be put off for the=20 future. On the other hand I do understand (and also agree on) the=20 reasons for releasing Forrest, so my vote would be something like +0.5 (but +1 if i18n is ready to roll/be tested - how is it going,=20 Upayavira?) to the extent that my vote counts (this is my first vote - I read the=20 Apache wiki on voting, but I don't consider myself a committer, one=20 with voting power;) Sjur