forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Forrest graduation from Xml.Apache
Date Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:42:59 GMT
David Crossley wrote:

> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>David Crossley wrote:
>>>* Committees and paperwork. :-)
>>Well, AFAIK the only paperwork the trimestral report for the board.
> The point was an attempted joke - note the smiley.


(I'm the smiley fanatic, don't you dare put in more smilies than me! Ha 
ha ha ha :->) :-D

>>>* Would we still retain some affiliation with the Apache XML
>>>umbrella project?
>>Why not? :-)
> ?
> I should have been more explicit. We definitely have affiliation.
> How? What would it be in real life? A link from their webpage?
> A complete "introduction" page at and the rest
> at ... I suppose those are minor details.

My "why not?" was in fact not a question but more like "yeah, why not?" 
like "I'm fine with it".

> How would our PMC relate to Xml PMC? Does it need to, or is
> the website association sufficient?

Well, let's say that all XML projects go top-level... what happens to 
Xml.Apache? Maybe the general list and the Commons repository and 
community. What about keeping someone on the XML PMC and making it 
possible to have access to the Commons CVS?

> ... sorry, just thinking out loud and trying to determine how
> our PMC is composed and what its role is.

It's actually a good point.

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

View raw message