Nicola Ken Barozzi escribió:
>>
>> So what will be the output without all the skinconf elements?
>
>
> Good question, easy answer.
>
> The search box should search the whole web, the skinconf trail should
> not show, the header should not even appear, the colors are of the
> standard theme for the skin, etc...
>
Well, I do not feel that this is right, all the element should behave in
the same way, so If we remove the search element, then it should not
appear on the site.
>> If the DTD will not change is because it does not validate for the
>> elements say:
>>
>> <feature name="search" value="true">
>> <property name="foo">xml.apache.org</property>
>> <property name="morefoo">Apache XML</property>
>> </feature>
>>
>> On a skin there is a expectation for
>> feature[@name='search']/property/attribute::name
>>
>> So it will not work and it will not display xml.apache.org
>
>
> Correct, it will not work, as the names of the parameters are wrong. I
> don't think it's too difficult to understand for the user: feature not
> working == params not correct.
>
But would not be better to detect this problem before?, If the only
proposal is to check for xml well formess then turn it validation off is
enough.
> We would loose a benefit but gain others. IMHO the gains are much
> bigger, especially seeing how the current system has not worked too well.
>
could you expand on what actually has not worked too well?
Cheers,
Cheche
|