forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] New skinconf format
Date Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:38:04 GMT
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> In this way we get lax and extensible elements but reasonable editing.
> The DTD will not change, so we can easily inline it in the XML, thus 
> making it trivial for validating editors to validate it (no catalogs to 
> set).
> In this way we will have a simple skinconf DTD, that is both extensible 
> and formally validated.
> +1

+1 from me. As Cheche said, we do lose something important
with the old ability to ensure that parameter names are correct.
However, i am prepared to try this approach. We can always develop
some additional validation method, now that we do not trip up on
a complex DTD.


View raw message