Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61299 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 16:46:52 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 16:46:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 19207 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2004 16:45:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 19072 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2004 16:45:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 19021 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 16:45:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.try.sybase.com) (130.214.10.19) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 16:45:10 -0000 Received: from mail.try.sybase.com (mail.try.sybase.com [130.214.10.18]) by mx1.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i22Fgg221851; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:42:42 -0700 Received: from tsws1 ([10.22.120.107]) by mail.try.sybase.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i22GRWk29191; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:27:32 -0700 Message-ID: <154901c40075$b7b606f0$d88b1f43@tsws1> From: "Adam R. B. Jack" To: Cc: References: <0b7001c3fef6$63d5c5f0$d88b1f43@tsws1><0d1b01c3ffa3$25089f20$d88b1f43@tsws1><0e1901c3ffa8$33229980$d88b1f43@tsws1><0ec401c3ffb2$25b8de80$d88b1f43@tsws1><143e01c4006a$1e4d1cc0$d88b1f43@tsws1> Subject: Re: Gump TLP Site Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 09:44:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > So, your forrest (likely a week later of CVS HEAD than mine) I just updated mine from CVS HEAD. Guess what, busted again, I get the same results as you... Can the Forrest folk help us with why this is failing? I assume that not getting useful error messages from RelaxNG is not in Forrest control, but maybe humans can eyeball (based of tweaks over the last week) and explain problems. Here is the skinconf as it currently stands: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/gump/src/documentation/skinconf.xml What I really don't get is if the validation schema is embedded in the XML document, how updates to forrest keep making this fail. I have to assume that a validation is occurring against a separate forrest file. Could I be pointed to that please? regards, Adam