From forrest-dev-return-8241-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Mon Dec 01 11:50:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39755 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 11:50:16 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 11:50:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 79559 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2003 11:50:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79523 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2003 11:50:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79512 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 11:50:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.iinet.net.au) (203.59.3.35) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 11:50:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 17472 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 11:50:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mouse.iinet.net.au) (203.173.28.114) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 1 Dec 2003 11:50:11 -0000 Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031201224934.02fd20f0@mail.iinet.net.au> X-Sender: gstamp@mail.iinet.net.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:50:09 +1100 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org From: Glen Stampoultzis Subject: Re: Site-wide PDF In-Reply-To: References: <20031121124223.B7A8F4D9C9@euros.telenet-ops.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_184123859==.ALT" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --=====================_184123859==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 12:17 AM 22/11/2003, you wrote: >>And if you follow the documentation, you'll end up using site.xml. > >This is true, but it would break lots of legacy sites we have. > >Unless of course we make site.xml mandatory and make a tool to convert >book.xml systems to site.xml, but I dunno if that's what we want. I could tell you I would use such a tool. :-) Regards, Glen Stampoultzis gstamp@iinet.net.au http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ --=====================_184123859==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" At 12:17 AM 22/11/2003, you wrote:
And if you follow the documentation, you'll end up using site.xml.

This is true, but it would break lots of legacy sites we have.

Unless of course we make site.xml mandatory and make a tool to convert book.xml systems to site.xml, but I dunno if that's what we want.

I could tell you I would use such a tool. :-) 

Regards,

Glen Stampoultzis
gstamp@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
--=====================_184123859==.ALT--