David Crossley wrote:
...
> A) Forrest should be able to process DocBook documents and render
> them with the complete "DocBook XSL". This does not mean that
> Forrest's native format will be DocBook, but if a project uses
> some DocBook documents then they will get handled. (The ability
> to integrate with Forrest navigation is left to another issue.)
-0 as it "circumvents" forrest's ability to cross-render
> B) Forrest should be able to transform DocBook (using a minimal
> subset) into Forrest's native document-v12 format and render that
> as per default. It would be clearly stated (and perhaps enforced
> by validation) that it only handles a very limited subset. There is
> already a demonstration of this in the 'forrest seed site'.
-0 as I don't see why a minimal subset of docook is more appealing than
native document-v12, and even more when we move th xhtml2
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|