Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52979 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 19:11:13 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 19:11:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 16186 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2003 19:11:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 16159 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2003 19:11:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 16147 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 19:11:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.datazug.ch) (212.4.65.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 19:11:00 -0000 Received: from yahoo.de [212.4.78.165] by mail.datazug.ch with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.02) id A2C78EFC0298; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 21:11:03 +0200 Message-ID: <3F85B2C7.9070408@yahoo.de> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 21:11:03 +0200 From: "J.Pietschmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: DTDs vs. Schemas References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Andrew Savory wrote: > I've been playing around with the Forrest DTD, and have hit upon the > limitation of having no W3 XML Schema for it. (I need namespaces, so DTDs > are no use to me.) > > Before I spend time converting the current DTDs to schemas, does anyone > already have some, and if so, could they commit them to CVS? You should take a look at the CyberNeko DTD converter: http://www.apache.org/~andyc/neko/doc/index.html or Trang http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/trang.html Neither is an install&go but still much simpler than to rewrite moderatly complex DTDs as WXS by hand. J.Pietschmann