Return-Path: 
 <forrest-dev-return-7750-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16941 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2003 02:07:30 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2003 02:07:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 91163 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2003 02:07:11 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91133 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2003 02:07:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:forrest-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 91122 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2003 02:07:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (65.77.211.84)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2003 02:07:10 -0000
Received: from dialup-77.147.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au
 (dialup-77.147.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au [203.220.147.77])
	(authenticated)
	by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9427MZ19837
	for <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 21:07:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Forrest 0.5.1 release
From: David Crossley <crossley@indexgeo.com.au>
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <3F7D8789.4010102@che-che.com>
References: <20031002125112.GA14819@expresso.localdomain>
	 <3F7CD2A1.1060506@che-che.com> <20031003115412.GC1627@expresso.localdomain>
	 <3F7D8789.4010102@che-che.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1065233234.1900.9944.camel@ighp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) 
Date: 04 Oct 2003 12:07:15 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
> Jeff Turner wrote:
> >Someone wrote:
> >>Can we leave a bit more time than for 0.5 to avoid been hit by a cocoon
> >>bug?
> > 
> > 3 days seems an adequate time to discover major flaws.  The Cocoon in RC2
> > is only 10 days later than that in RC1, so I'd be surprised to find
> > anything changed.
> 
> so you are using the voting period as testing period.
> 
> well, I think that a bit of time before the vote doers not hurd anyone, 
> this allows users and us time to test.
<snip/>

I interpret such a "vote" to mean "say +1 if you are happy to release
now". I held off from voting until i had tested it with some complex
websites. So i think that the approach that we use is fine.

All interested developers should be testing as we go anyway.

--David