From forrest-dev-return-7637-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Wed Oct 01 21:36:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6901 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2003 21:36:51 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2003 21:36:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 85740 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2003 21:36:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 85636 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2003 21:36:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 85624 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2003 21:36:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO correo.che-che.com) (80.34.215.206) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2003 21:36:35 -0000 Received: from che-che.com (carolo [192.168.1.5]) by correo.che-che.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13C4C7B7 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:36:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3F7B48E6.9080209@che-che.com> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 23:36:38 +0200 From: Juan Jose Pablos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030311 Debian/1.2.1-10 X-Accept-Language: es, en, no, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: BROKEN: UTFDataFormatException: String cannot be longer than 32k. References: <026901c38828$af002ec0$8d103b41@tsws1> <1065017420.3f7ae04c7b058@secure.solidusdesign.com> <02f101c3882d$eb847c20$8d103b41@tsws1> <3F7AF24F.2090003@che-che.com> <03ad01c38839$04700730$8d103b41@tsws1> In-Reply-To: <03ad01c38839$04700730$8d103b41@tsws1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > Does this work for you? http://gump.chalko.com/py It does. > My only problem is I don't know if the output is > 32k. Some CVS updates > appear to be. Ok, then I am not sure about the best approach here. "cvs -q update" maybe Cheers, Cheche