Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:17:19 +1000
From: Jeff Turner <jefft@apache.org>
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mixed-namespace support (Re: cvs commit: ...)
Message-ID: <20030909091719.GA2416@expresso.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
References: <20030908134815.85048.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
 <20030908232710.GB65879@minotaur.apache.org> <3F5D24BA.3090308@che-che.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F5D24BA.3090308@che-che.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 02:54:18AM +0200, Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
> Jeff,
> 
> I personally thought that we were going to let a bit more time to test
> forrest with cocoon 2.1.1 (2 weeks).

Why bother?  We'll get a lot more testers by releasing 0.5 now and
releasing 0.5.1 if we discover any bugs in Cocoon.

> But for some reason you want to release this ASAP, that is ok, but given 
> that people hurried to commit stuff, can we delay this release for 
> Wednesday?

Looks like it.


--Jeff

> >Does all this stuff (and @class) *have* to happen a few hours before 0.5
> >gets released?  Couldn't it wait 24 hours for 0.6, when we have a decent
> >multi-namespace validation system[1] in place?
> >
> >Same for @class attributes -- I don't care whether it's good or bad; I
> >don't want to even consider it for 0.5.  We can do a 0.5.1 any time.
> >
> >
> >--Jeff
> 
> 
> cheers,
> cheche
> 
> BTW: 0.4 and 0.2RC1 were released on Wednesday.
>