forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <>
Subject Re: Forrest: dynamic or static?
Date Sun, 21 Sep 2003 07:25:07 GMT
Jeff Turner wrote:
> Being a Cocoon distribution, there is a huge amount of stuff that Forrest
> *could* include.  I think we need to draw a line, define what Forrest
> actually is, and stick to that.
> The line I propose is that Forrest should be regarded as an offline site
> generation tool that happens to have an online mode for rapid page
> development.  There should be no features _unusable_ from a static site.
> For especially useful features, like searching, we can bend the rule and
> have online/offline equivalents (lucene and google).

Definitely +1. We should clearly express that line in our documentation.
This reminds us of the "scope" discussions that we had a while ago.


View raw message