forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ramon Prades" <rpra...@porcelanosa.com>
Subject RE: about lucent and exist
Date Fri, 12 Sep 2003 06:59:26 GMT
OK,

That seems to be a good reason to forget Exists.

Thanks

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Steven Noels [mailto:stevenn@outerthought.org] 
> Enviado el: viernes, 12 de septiembre de 2003 8:55
> Para: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: about lucent and exist
> 
> 
> Ramon Prades wrote:
> 
> > I've been browsing Exist site. It seems that can be used instead of 
> > Lucene, but I'm not sure yet about the  advantages. I'll 
> have a closer 
> > look and we can discuss this issue again in a few days to 
> decide what 
> > to use before doing any more work.
> 
> Keep in mind that eXist is LGPL-licensed, so the library jars 
> cannot be 
> stored nor distributed through Apache CVS / websites, and there's a 
> coding policy not to make use of LGPL libs in ASF code.
> 
> Lucene might be the safest bet IMHO.
> 
> </Steven>
> -- 
> Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
> Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML            An Orixo Member
> Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
> stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org
> 
> 
> 



Mime
View raw message