Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 27019 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2003 08:51:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 26914 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2003 08:51:33 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (80.91.224.249) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2003 08:51:33 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19kK0w-0003nX-00 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 10:51:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19kK0v-0003nH-00 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 10:51:21 +0200 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Subject: Re: Moving map:components to the root sitemap? Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 10:49:47 +0200 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <20030805065431.GB57991@minotaur.apache.org> <3F2F648C.4070608@che-che.com> <20030805122914.GA361@expresso.localdomain> <3F2FC640.3000501@che-che.com> <20030805224753.GA72065@minotaur.apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20030805224753.GA72065@minotaur.apache.org> Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jeff Turner wrote, On 06/08/2003 0.47: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 04:59:12PM +0200, Juan Jose Pablos wrote: ... >>I looked on the issue with the menu.xmap and I think that the config >>component can be used in more than one map, so it makes sense to have >>it on sitemap. > > Yes, it _can_ be used in multiple places, but currently it is used in > only one. Things should be scoped locally until the necessity for global > scoping becomes apparent. +1 >>I rather have an error when I upgrade than a side effect that I am not >>aware of. > > As a user, I'd rather have my site _not_ be broken every time someone > adds a new feature to Forrest ;) +1 -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------