Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 65453 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2003 18:49:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 65311 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2003 18:49:56 -0000 Received: from mail.datazug.ch (212.4.65.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2003 18:49:56 -0000 Received: from yahoo.de [212.4.78.165] by mail.datazug.ch with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.01) id AF56F18102A8; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:49:58 +0200 Message-ID: <3F329F53.7060708@yahoo.de> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:49:55 +0200 From: "J.Pietschmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: imaging issues /FOPException References: <9BE1E9438E5902489BD91AF2359D14AC60F6C3@pol> In-Reply-To: <9BE1E9438E5902489BD91AF2359D14AC60F6C3@pol> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Johan Andries wrote: > We have found out that using an image with a large width could crash the > website generation on older Forrest cvs versions. Is this a known issue It is. > or should I reconfigure something in order to be able to play around > with lots of (and possibly rather big) images? If you can avoid putting the width/height into the FO file, bitmap images will automatically be scaled to fit. SVGs are clipped. J.Pietschmann