Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <3F30E375.3050005@che-che.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 13:16:05 +0200
From: Juan Jose Pablos <cheche@che-che.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030311 Debian/1.2.1-10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving map:components to the root sitemap?
References: <20030805065431.GB57991@minotaur.apache.org>
 <3F2F648C.4070608@che-che.com> <20030805122914.GA361@expresso.localdomain>
 <3F2FC640.3000501@che-che.com> <20030805224753.GA72065@minotaur.apache.org>
 <3F30CD27.9080409@che-che.com> <20030806104107.GA324@expresso.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20030806104107.GA324@expresso.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jeff,

Jeff Turner wrote:
> 
> That's the way Forrest works.  You go as far as you can with the default
> sitemap, and when you hit a limitation you override the sitemap.  How
> else could it be done?
> 

If we assume that people will overwrite sitemap, then we should have 
just the pipelines and delegate resposability to the submaps.

> 
> That's more or less what sitemap.xmap does, or have I misunderstood you?
> 

you have things like "skinit" as well, I would like to move them out 
sitemap.

>>Keep components definitions local/globalize
> 
> 
> ?

That is the other option. Leave things as they are.


Cheers,
Cheche