Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <34916.10.0.0.5.1057899049.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 22:50:49 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: site.xml tabs.xml part of  content??
From: "Antonio Gallardo" <agallardo@agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
To: <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <34800.10.0.0.5.1057879176.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
References: <34406.10.0.0.5.1057817642.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
        <3F0D9F1E.5050309@che-che.com>
        <34783.10.0.0.5.1057878292.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
        <3F0DF336.6060105@che-che.com>
        <34800.10.0.0.5.1057879176.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com>
Importance: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Juan Jose Pablos dijo:
> Hi!,
> Is there a real reason of why we have site.xml and tabs.xml files inside
>  of the content/xdocs directory?

I agree with you. Since tabs.xml and site.xml are more related to order of
the site instead of be related to the content of the site, your conclusion
is coherent to me. This change will add more order to the sources.

>
> I do not see a reason of why we put site.xml there:
>
> menu.xmap:        <map:generate src="content/xdocs/site.xml" />
> linkmap.xmap:        <map:generate src="content/xdocs/site.xml" />
> sitemap.xmap:        <map:match pattern="site.xml">
>
> and after create rules to ignore it:
>
> forrest.properties:#forrest.validate.xdocs.excludes=site.xml


>
>
> I think that same apply to the tabs.xml file.
>
> I think that both should be on src/documentation with skinconf.xml
>


Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo