Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <1058793879.3f1be997bf162@secure.solidusdesign.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:24:39 -0400
From: Dave Brondsema <dave@brondsema.net>
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-forrest/src/resources/stylesheets
 text2document.xsl
References: <20030718001723.95409.qmail@icarus.apache.org>
 <3F173FE7.8090507@che-che.com>
 <1058529624.3f17e158bca52@secure.solidusdesign.com>
 <3F17E6BA.1070706@che-che.com>
 <1058533377.3f17f00190b31@secure.solidusdesign.com>
 <3F1B7A27.9000105@che-che.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F1B7A27.9000105@che-che.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1

Quoting Juan Jose Pablos <cheche@che-che.com>:

> Dave,
> 
> > It would be nice to have all 3 formats available.  Can this also be done
> from
> > the xdocs directory?
> > 
> > It is my understanding that only files in xdocs/ are modified and that all
> other
> > files in content/ are kept as they are.  For example, .cwiki files are not
> XML
> > but they are in the xdocs/ directory.  Since .cwiki and .txt files can be
> > transformed to the Document XML format, I think it makes sense to have them
> in
> > the xdocs/ directory.
> > 
> 
> If your understanding that only files in xdocs/ are modified why should 
> I put a rule to allow txt to be kept as they are?
> 

> 
> I rather prefer to have only *one* DOCUMENT_ROOT and stop having to 
> maintain two directories trees. any thoughts?
> 

This makes sense to me.  The pipelines already distinguish based on extension, I
don't see a reason to have the 'xdocs' directory ... it just makes things more
complicated and difficult for users to maintain.

-- 
Dave Brondsema
dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net - personal
http://www.splike.com - programming