Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 12153 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2003 20:52:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 12141 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2003 20:52:22 -0000 Received: from main.gmane.org (80.91.224.249) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2003 20:52:22 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19SNPs-00020W-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 22:50:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19SNNz-0001oc-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 22:48:59 +0200 From: Stefano Mazzocchi Subject: Re: Speed (was Re: Forrest 0.5 outstanding issues...)) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:50:15 -0500 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <3EEE03E8.5080204@apache.org> <20030617124219.GB3286@expresso.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20030617124219.GB3286@expresso.localdomain> Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N on 6/17/03 7:42 AM Jeff Turner wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:52:40PM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > .... > >>Ok, done some profiling. >>Attached is the result for a page. >> >>First of all, there is a lot of difference between the first invocation >>and the 4,5th one, that takes 50% less time. This happens also with the >>non-caching pipeline, even if in the report there is not anymore as I >>exceeded 10 calls (believe me). >> >>But the major thing that I see is this in the non-caching body-index.html. >> >> 20+1+1+39+49+3 != 355 !!!! >> >>There are 242ms missing! Wierd, huh? > > > Even weirder, if you add up the times: > > 130 body-index.html > 50 menu-index.html > 28 tab-index.html > 210 site2xhtml > > That adds up to 418ms, but the page total is around 1s. So over half our > time is being lost somewhere inside Cocoon or Jetty. Or the profiler's precision sucks ass (which would be the one I would bet on). -- Stefano.