Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 22175 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2003 13:50:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 22164 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2003 13:50:05 -0000 Received: from dobit2.ugent.be (HELO dobit2.rug.ac.be) (157.193.42.8) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2003 13:50:05 -0000 Received: from allserv.UGent.be (allserv.ugent.be [157.193.40.42]) by dobit2.rug.ac.be (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5UDo5b9021771 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:50:05 +0200 (MEST) Received: from otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (otsrv1.iic.ugent.be [157.193.121.51]) by allserv.UGent.be (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5UDo40E003026 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:50:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from outerthought.org (host104 [192.168.123.104]) by otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5UDo4x23858 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:50:04 +0200 Message-ID: <3F00400B.4040503@outerthought.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:50:03 +0200 From: Steven Noels Organization: Outerthought User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Back to home-grown docs? (Re: [RT] New Target: sub-sitemap) References: <20030630132108.GA1217@expresso.localdomain> <3F003C58.10906@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3F003C58.10906@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 30/06/2003 15:34 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > But you do make valid points. He always does. Big toothbrush. > Here is a counterproposal: > > 1 - since we have basically voted to be part of the Cocoon project, > give all Cocoon developers access to Forrest CVS AFAIU, we agreed enthusiastically that the karma barrier for Cocoon committers to Forrest CVS should be drastically lowered. From the Forrest devs however, the way I read it there was reluctancy in stating that this essentially means becoming a Cocoon subproject - maybe the time isn't there yet, or might perhaps never come. > 2 - Forrest should be able to be used as a Cocoon block. +1 The current blocks implementation however doesn't easily allows for externaly maintained bloks. -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org