forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Give all Cocoon committers CVS access?
Date Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:12:16 GMT
on 6/24/03 7:19 AM Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
>>Jeff Turner wrote, On 24/06/2003 13.38:
>>
>>
>>>As most of you probably saw, there's a thread on cocoon-dev suggesting
>>>that Forrest ought to be a Cocoon subproject, with the 
>>
>>consensus being it
>>
>>>"makes sense".
>>>
>>>AFAICT the only practical difference would be that Cocoon committers
>>>would automatically become Forrest committers.  Sounds fine to me.  Can
>>>we vote on these issues then?
>>>
>>>Vote 1: Cocoon committers automatically become Forrest committers
>>
>>+1
>>
> 
> +1

+1

> 
>>>Vote 2: Forrest should become a subproject of Cocoon
>>>(http://cocoon.apache.org/forrest)
>>
>>+1
>>
> 
> +1

+1

> 
>></SNIP>
>>
>>PS: This makes me think that Linotype should have its own project rather 
>>than being just a block...
>>
> 
> I think some other current blocks are good candidates as subprojects but
> I guess we are not ready for that now - I think, this fits a little bit
> in the context of "real blocks".

I agree with Carsten here, until we have a real deployment
infrastructure, it would just create more harm than good to
hyperfragment our blocks into their own projects.

-- 
Stefano.




Mime
View raw message