forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Give all Cocoon committers CVS access?
Date Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:26:07 GMT
Jeff Turner wrote:
> As most of you probably saw, there's a thread on cocoon-dev suggesting
> that Forrest ought to be a Cocoon subproject, with the consensus being it
> "makes sense".
> AFAICT the only practical difference would be that Cocoon committers
> would automatically become Forrest committers.  Sounds fine to me.  Can
> we vote on these issues then?
> Vote 1: Cocoon committers automatically become Forrest committers

+1 ... love the twist - parents join the children.

> Vote 2: Forrest should become a subproject of Cocoon
> (

0 ... While it might make sense, i cannot yet see the pros and cons. 
Perhaps we need some discussion before voting on this. One thing
that might make a difference is that the Cocoon PMC is more active
(though i am not on the XML PMC so i cannot really tell) and is more
relevant to the issues that Forrest encounters.

One disadvantage with moving Cocoon and Forrest away from
is that all Cocoon and Forrest committers are already automatically
committers on xml-commons and could be helping that important project
to find its feet.


View raw message