Return-Path: 
 <forrest-dev-return-5802-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94521 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2003 14:50:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:forrest-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94512 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 14:50:38 -0000
Received: from host190-154.pool80204.interbusiness.it (HELO PC103)
 (80.204.154.190)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2003 14:50:38 -0000
Message-ID: <3ED2297D.1070109@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 16:49:33 +0200
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicolaken@apache.org>
Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org
Organization: Apache Software Foundation
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [USER POLL/VOTE] Defining tabs?
References: <3EC4E51C.4000206@che-che.com> <3EC4E784.2030004@apache.org>
 <3EC501B6.60308@che-che.com> <3EC51539.10108@apache.org>
 <3EC51A32.5060901@che-che.com> <3EC60229.90900@apache.org>
 <3EC98320.3030409@che-che.com> <3ED1BC65.2060607@apache.org>
 <20030526104426.GA6029@expresso.localdomain> <3ED20089.8050203@apache.org>
 <20030526123030.GB6029@expresso.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20030526123030.GB6029@expresso.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-GCMulti: 1
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N



Jeff Turner wrote, On 26/05/2003 14.30:

> On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 01:54:49PM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
>>Wouldn't it work equally well if we simply show the children of a 
>>site:xxx link in tabs.xml instead of the dir ones? It would even be less 
>> changes for the users, but maybe I'm missing something.
> 
> Sorry I'm not following. "children of a site:xxx link in tabs.xml"?

Sorry, I mean that if tabs.xml has a site:x/y/z link, then all the 
children of the //x/y/z element are the ones shown.

Example from ours

site.xml:
<site ...>
   <about label="About">
     ...
   </about>
   <getting-involved label="Getting Involved">
     ...
   </getting-involved>
   <documentation label="Documentation">
   ...etc


in tab.xml
     <tab sitepath="about"/>
     <tab sitepath="about/download"/>
     <tab sitepath="getting-involved"/>
     <tab sitepath="documentation"/>

Basically, what I mean is that it's not necessary to use ids, we can use 
an xpath to site.xml instead.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------