Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 42244 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2003 12:07:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 42232 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 12:07:58 -0000 Received: from 206.red-80-34-215.pooles.rima-tde.net (HELO correo.che-che.com) (80.34.215.206) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2003 12:07:58 -0000 Received: from che-che.com (carolo [192.168.1.5]) by correo.che-che.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F56C752 for ; Mon, 26 May 2003 14:07:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3ED2039D.6030202@che-che.com> Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 14:07:57 +0200 From: Juan Jose Pablos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030311 Debian/1.2.1-10 X-Accept-Language: es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [USER POLL/VOTE] Defining tabs? References: <20030513224935.61681.qmail@web40301.mail.yahoo.com> <3EC1DB00.2000906@apache.org> <3EC2430C.6070106@che-che.com> <3EC24A4D.9060001@apache.org> <3EC25E81.5040808@che-che.com> <3EC33423.10003@apache.org> <20030515121802.GC4404@expresso.localdomain> <3EC4E51C.4000206@che-che.com> <3EC4E784.2030004@apache.org> <3EC501B6.60308@che-che.com> <3EC51539.10108@apache.org> <3EC51A32.5060901@che-che.com> <3EC60229.90900@apache.org> <3EC98320.3030409@che-che.com> <3ED1BC65.2060607@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3ED1BC65.2060607@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola, >>> >>> >> what I like from the tabs was that you were allow to select only the >> navigation links relative to that directory. > > Which is conceptually wrong, as the navigation is not necessarily > dependant on the dir layout, but on the link layout in site.xml. Sorry, I did not mean directory, I wanted to say site element that is why I used site:whatever on the description on the top >> but do you have to write down again all the links you want for the >> navigation links on the left? if you do it like that, what is tab >> diferent from menu? > > > IMV it's not different. Each tab in this view should have its own set of > menus. Even if you have you own set, they should be a reference, I would not like to write down the same information again. > What Jeff has proposed is the best IMHO. It can accomodate a skin that > allows tabs to show things at the skin's wish. We'll see if the impl > will be nice enough for users. we will see that tomorrow. but I think that it is closer to what I am saying..