Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 49655 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2003 22:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 49646 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 22:39:33 -0000 Received: from firewall.medata.com (HELO mail.medata.com) (65.104.121.53) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2003 22:39:33 -0000 Received: from medata.com (cleeds [172.24.2.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.medata.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4FMdqFo022225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 15:39:52 -0700 Message-ID: <3EC41729.7050705@medata.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:39:37 -0700 From: Clay Leeds Organization: Medata, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Improving FAQ readability on FOP/faq.html X-Enigmail-Version: 0.75.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I posted this to the FOP-DEV list and they recommended I post it here instead... I've noticed that the TOC for the FAQ page is hard to read: http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html (perhaps others have noticed this too?). I figure, that if you remove the hyperlink to the numbered items (leaving the links for their sub-items), it'll probably improve readability: * 1. General Questions (<-- remove this hyperlink) o What is FOP? (<-- leave these hyperlinks) o What can I do with FOP? (<-- leave these hyperlinks) ... (<-- leave these hyperlinks) * 2. Problems running FOP (<-- remove this hyperlink) o yata yata (<-- leave these hyperlinks) It might also help to put a space-before="6pt" for each of those numbered items. In addition, is there a reason that the "ordered" list items are preceded by an "unordered" "bullet"? (see above)? It seems like it could be removed. -- Clay Leeds - cleeds@medata.com Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc