Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 19220 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2003 02:34:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 19211 invoked from network); 31 May 2003 02:34:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (65.77.211.84) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 May 2003 02:34:53 -0000 Received: from dialup-63.147.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au (dialup-63.147.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au [203.220.147.63]) (authenticated) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4V2Z0w09042 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 21:35:01 -0500 Subject: Re: Form Handler? From: David Crossley To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org In-Reply-To: <3ED79A84.8090500@cisco.com> References: <3ED79A84.8090500@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 31 May 2003 12:34:56 +1000 Message-Id: <1054348501.1592.528746.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jason Kary wrote: > > I am fairly new to Forrest and Cocoon. I was reading through some of > the recent messages in the list and I thought the head version of > forrest was recently upgraded to use Cocoon 2.1? Is this a correct > assumption? That is correct ... cocoon-2.1M2 pre-release milestone. The Forrest cvs was also marked with the tag "stable" after a few of us tested it on our own sites and on the current Cocoon xdocs. So use that, or join the bleeding edge. > I've been trying to get forrest to use forms as defined by the Cocoon > 2.1 documentation. Does anyone know if this is possible with forrest? I do not know about this ... great if it can. I presume that you are aware that there are various "forms" implementations in Cocoon-2.1 --David