forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Johan Andries" ...@schaubroeck.be>
Subject RE: [USER POLL/VOTE] Defining tabs?
Date Fri, 16 May 2003 13:41:12 GMT
-1

Obviously depends on the structure a developer wants his/her site to have. Choosing option
1 or 2 sounds like throwing away flexibility?

regards
Johan

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van:	Nicola Ken Barozzi [SMTP:nicolaken@apache.org]
> Verzonden:	vrijdag 16 mei 2003 15:29
> Aan:	forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
> Onderwerp:	[USER POLL/VOTE] Defining tabs?
> 
> 
> We have seen that there are different interpretations about what tabs 
> are, so we need to just decide what forrest thinks they are.
> 
> Tabs can be seen as:
> 
>   1 - shortcuts to certain parts of the site, as tabs in a book
>   2 - containers of separate parts of a site, as tabs on file folders.
> 
> In case 1 the links on the navigation are not contextualized, and the 
> tab is just a link, not a container. In case 2, each tab contains its 
> own set of navigation links.
> 
> Current implementation is a mixture of the two, where the tabs are just 
> links but nevertheless contextualized.
> 
> So, users and devs, what do you prefer tabs to be?
> 
>   [] 1 - shortcuts to certain parts of the site
>   [] 2 - containers of separate parts of a site
>   [] 3 - exactly as now
> 
> I just vote -1 for option 3, and any in 1 or 2 are fine for me.
> 
> -- 
> Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
>              - verba volant, scripta manent -
>     (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

Mime
View raw message