Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 92820 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2003 11:57:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 92809 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 11:57:07 -0000 Received: from dobit2.rug.ac.be (157.193.42.8) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 11:57:07 -0000 Received: from allserv.rug.ac.be (allserv.rug.ac.be [157.193.40.42]) by dobit2.rug.ac.be (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3UBv7qk013965 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:57:07 +0200 (MEST) Received: from otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be [157.193.121.51]) by allserv.rug.ac.be (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3UBv6aU010561 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:57:06 +0200 (MEST) Received: from outerthought.org (host104 [192.168.123.104]) by otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3UBv6x20525 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:57:06 +0200 Message-ID: <3EAFBA12.4070007@outerthought.org> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:57:06 +0200 From: Steven Noels Organization: Outerthought User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-forrest/src/documentation/content/xdocs primer.xml References: <20030430112614.73067.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <3EAFB945.8070203@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3EAFB945.8070203@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 30/04/2003 13:53 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > jefft@apache.org wrote, On 30/04/2003 13.26: > >> jefft 2003/04/30 04:26:14 >> >> Modified: src/documentation/content/xdocs primer.xml >> Log: >> a -> link > > > Correct... but it remembers me of the changes Steven hinted he would > change... *blush* > what about including in the 1.2 version also the a version of > link, all other changes we recently said Steven could do, and deprecate > current constructs (ie not remove, just keep sidebyside)? yuk. seems messy. either we do full xhtml2 at some point or not, but not a mixture of xdocs & xhtml IMHO -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org