Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20030117181447.03976120@mail.visitronics.be>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:15:32 +0100
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
From: Bert Van Kets <bert@vankets.com>
Subject: Re: xml.apache.org refactoring #1
In-Reply-To: <3E27FCCD.5090802@outerthought.org>
References: <3E27F93A.1090203@apache.org>
 <00ec01c2bd93$456738b0$0a00a8c0@boo>
 <3E271158.9060002@outerthought.org>
 <3E27F35D.4070407@apache.org>
 <3E27F93A.1090203@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 13:53 17/01/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>
>>>Steven Noels wrote:
>>>
>>>>Ted Leung wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Greetings all,
>>>>>
>>>>>  From our discussion last December, it seems clear to me that most of 
>>>>> the subprojects are not interested in becoming top-level 
>>>>> projects.  It also seems clear that people are interested broad based 
>>>>> representation in the XML PMC.   I think that the best way to improve 
>>>>> the issues related to project oversight is to have a series of small 
>>>>> refactorings.  So here's my proposal for the first refactoring:
>>>>>
>>>>>We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project 
>>>>>to be a part of the XML PMC.  From my experience, I think that it will 
>>>>>be better to have 2 people rather than one in order to share workload, etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'd be happy to do my share for Forrest.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>+1 for Steven as Forrest representative in the XML PMC.
>>>
>>>I would like to nominate Jeff for the other chair. But it's up to him to 
>>>decide that.
>>
>>+1 for both
>
>+1 once more
>-marc=

+1 from me too of course
Bert

----------------------------------------------
So much to do, so little time