Return-Path: 
 <forrest-dev-return-4567-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93428 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2003 20:08:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:forrest-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 93400 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 20:08:53 -0000
Received: from eos.telenet-ops.be (195.130.132.40)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 20:08:53 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by eos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 6BD8320424; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:08:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from outerthought.org (D576F372.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.243.114])
	by eos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C6E0D213DC; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:08:56 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <3E271158.9060002@outerthought.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 21:08:56 +0100
From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
Organization: Outerthought
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: general@xml.apache.org, forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Cc: pmc@xml.apache.org, board@apache.org
Subject: Re: xml.apache.org refactoring #1
References: <00ec01c2bd93$456738b0$0a00a8c0@boo>
In-Reply-To: <00ec01c2bd93$456738b0$0a00a8c0@boo>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Ted Leung wrote:

> Greetings all,
>  
>  From our discussion last December, it seems clear to me that most of 
> the subprojects are not interested in becoming top-level projects.  It 
> also seems clear that people are interested broad based representation 
> in the XML PMC.   I think that the best way to improve the issues 
> related to project oversight is to have a series of small refactorings.  
> So here's my proposal for the first refactoring:
>  
> We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to 
> be a part of the XML PMC.  From my experience, I think that it will 
> be better to have 2 people rather than one in order to share workload, 
> etc.

I'd be happy to do my share for Forrest.

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org