Return-Path: 
 <forrest-dev-return-4080-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 34262 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2002 20:25:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:forrest-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 34253 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 20:25:49 -0000
Received: from tartarus.telenet-ops.be (195.130.132.34)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 20:25:49 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by tartarus.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 67DEFDBFB5
	for <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 21:25:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from outerthought.org (D5E00A87.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.10.135])
	by tartarus.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1616ADC068
	for <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 21:25:53 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <3DF79F50.2020008@outerthought.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 21:25:52 +0100
From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
Organization: Outerthought
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] Adding protocols to links: why?
References: <20021209155925.GA1761@expresso.localdomain>
 <1039453241.9892.28.camel@yum.ot>
 <20021210051539.GA4027@expresso.localdomain>
 <3DF62F07.5030700@outerthought.org> <3DF647C4.8060604@apache.org>
 <20021211075449.GB2801@expresso.localdomain>
 <3DF6F87A.5020505@outerthought.org> <3DF79F50.1010202@yahoo.de>
In-Reply-To: <3DF79F50.1010202@yahoo.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

J.Pietschmann wrote:

> Nice try. If you want to use XSLT for mapping the semantic link
> to a concrete link for the target format, you'll basically have
> to parse an URL, something which is not exactly the primary
> strength of XSLT.
> A possible approach could be a separate map, hand edited and/or
> generated with some other tool (does somebody smell topic maps?)

Yucky ;-)

I'm not aiming at XSLT for this. A SchemeResolutionTransformer perhaps?

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at              http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org