forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Noels <>
Subject Re: [RT] Adding protocols to links: why?
Date Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:34:02 GMT
Jeff Turner wrote:

> 1) Links in xdocs are completely unrelated to links in output files.
> 2) I think we should evolve Forrest to where _every_ link is a semantic
>    link.  The file: scheme is the first stone thrown in this revolution.
>    Far from being not future-compatible, I propose that schemes like
>    file: _are_ the future :)

I like.

I don't like having to specify an attribute to indicate what type of 
resource is at the end of my arc - uri syntax should scale enough to put 
that all in one identifier.

Steven Noels                  
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at    
stevenn at                stevenn at

View raw message