forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew C. Oliver" <>
Subject Re: Bad dtding
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:41:18 GMT
Its also the version thats been in centipede for like 6 months or so. 
 From a user perspective...its very mean.  There are infinite numbers 
possible, I do not suggest numeric conservation as an appropriate tradeoff.


Steven Noels wrote:

> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>> Simple, he was using a development version.
>> I brought this topic up some months ago, because I felt that every 
>> change to the dtd had to imply a number change, but the decision was 
>> that till it wasn't "released" we kept the same number.
> I don't think trivial, _backwards-compatible_ changes warrant the 
> trouble of increasing version numbers, changing PUBLIC IDs, updating 
> catalogs, etc...
> Other opinions?
> </Steven>

View raw message