Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 65797 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2002 16:27:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 65707 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2002 16:27:13 -0000 Received: from fep01.tuttopmi.it (HELO fep01-svc.flexmail.it) (212.131.248.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2002 16:27:13 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([80.204.154.181]) by fep01-svc.flexmail.it (InterMail vM.5.01.05.09 201-253-122-126-109-20020611) with ESMTP id <20021111162712.OJOQ1512.fep01-svc.flexmail.it@apache.org> for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:27:12 +0100 Message-ID: <3DCFDA16.60704@apache.org> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:25:58 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Skin rewrite: 0.2 release? References: <20021111162633.GB13123@expresso.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jeff Turner wrote: > Hi, > > I'm 80% through rewriting all the skins to make heavy use of > , aka stylesheet inheritance. This makes skins _much_ easier > to maintain, since all the 'structural' XSLT is common to all skins, and > each skin's stylesheets contain only presentational stuff. > > As this is a major refactoring, how about doing a quick 0.2 "release" > right now? AFAIK everything is nice and stable, no known bugs.. docs > need updating but not urgently.. > > By "release", I mean: > > - Make sure what's in CVS has no glaring bugs. > - Tag CVS as 'FORREST_02' or something (now is a good time to suggest > a sane tag convention) > - Create 'src' and 'binary' (shbat) releases by hand, put them > somewhere.. anywhere, preferably somewhere official. > - (optional) Post on general@xml, or announcements@ if someone has > access. > > Really I just want to tag CVS.. how "official" we make the release > doesn't bother me. > > What do people think? I'm finishing just now to patch the sitemap to be able to accept sources from src/documentation/content directly instead of in the xdocs dir. It also searches in the legacy xdocs dir for compatibility. I want this to go in our first "unofficial" release, so we don't make users change doc source locations later on. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------