Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 793 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2002 09:20:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 780 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2002 09:20:23 -0000 Received: from smtp3.ihug.com.au (203.109.250.76) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2002 09:20:23 -0000 Received: from p1500-apx1.syd.ihug.com.au (expresso.localdomain) [203.173.139.230] by smtp3.ihug.com.au with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 18F9zG-00064C-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:20:34 +1100 Received: from jeff by expresso.localdomain with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18FA5B-0002vP-00 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:26:41 +1100 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:26:41 +1100 From: Jeff Turner To: "Forrest-Dev@Xml. Apache. Org" Subject: Re: Questions about book.xml Message-ID: <20021122092641.GE4124@expresso.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: "Forrest-Dev@Xml. Apache. Org" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:42:30AM +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi Forrest Team, > > first of all: a big congratulations to you all. I looked > at the latest version of forrest and I'm really impressed > by the rather simple usage *and* the good documenation > to get started. Simply fantastic! :) glad to hear > To get my own site running I wondered a little bit about > the book.xml document, it always starts like this: > > title="Apache Forrest" > copyright="@year@ The Apache Software Foundation"> > > These information (at least the title, I didn't look > if the other two as well) are used in the stylesheets > and are rendered in the generated documents. > > But these information are already provided in the > project configuration (skinconfig.xml, I think it was). > Is it possible to remove the information from book.xml > and use the project configuration instead? Yes, the duplication is rather pointless. +1 on making these attributes optional and deprecated. In general, I think that menus (book.xml) and project metadata (currently skinconf.xml, in future perhaps forrestconf.xml) should be kept separately. --Jeff > Carsten