Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 55721 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2002 00:04:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 55712 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2002 00:04:19 -0000 Received: from mailgate1.sover.net (209.198.87.60) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2002 00:04:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (dialup487.wnskvtao.sover.net [216.114.161.234]) by mailgate1.sover.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAI04P623261 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:04:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 19:02:31 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: anchor within li? From: Diana Shannon To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <086980BB-FA89-11D6-A992-0030653FE818@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.482) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is it an oversight that anchor elements aren't allowed within li elements as per document-v11.dtd? It seems that long lists within some kinds of documents may have links pointing to other li's later on in the list. This has come up within Cocoon docs. Diana