forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Noels <stev...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: more validation suckage..
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:46:06 GMT
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

 > But his need is still there and it's not only his IIUC. <i><b>
 > </b></i> is a common construct, and till I don't understand if any
 > why there is a need for a third empasis I don't know if we should
 > create a <strongem> </strongem> tag or not...

I would prefer calling it <shout> or <yell>

or using the Dutch way of 'increasing' things:

<em>blabla <emmer>foo baa <emst>baaaaz</emst> flow</emmer> foofoo</em>

Kidding aside, I'll try & review things when time allows. There might be 
other inline element containment issues which we haven't encountered yet.

 > ...even if I have the feeling that this request was meant to be used
 > for presentation instead of semantics ;-)

Yep - hence my unwillingness.

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at              http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org


Mime
View raw message