Return-Path: 
 <forrest-dev-return-2838-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 4023 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2002 22:31:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:forrest-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 4000 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2002 22:31:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.multitask.com.au) (203.41.143.113)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 2002 22:31:16 -0000
In-Reply-To: <3DBBAA0F.4040303@outerthought.org>
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Forrest uses 'old' version of Ant
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0 September 26, 2002
From: dion@multitask.com.au
Message-ID: 
 <OF44D17C79.73331780-ONCA256C5F.0077B1C7-CA256C5F.007BE463@multitask.com.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:51:48 +1100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on gateway/Multitask Consulting/AU(Release
 5.0.8 |June
 18, 2001) at 10/28/2002 09:51:49 AM,
	Serialize complete at 10/28/2002 09:51:49 AM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords: 

I'm +1 on the multiple distributions of Forrest.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers


Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org> wrote on 27/10/2002 07:55:43 PM:

> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
> > I am discussing about using Forrest in a project, and they just said 
> > that having to install Forrest is a no-no.
> > 
> > They want to have all Forrest checked in with every site, so that the 
> > doc writer can get from CVS, and run build.bat/.sh.
> 
> > It has been discussed before, I agree it sucks, but it's what our 
users 
> > need.
> 
> Aren't we overgeneralizing here? 'They', 'our users',... or just the few 

> opinionated ones that believe their way is the way?
> 
> I like the shbat approach - just like I like the ability to install Ant 
> as a separate app instead of just using the jars.
> 
> We should come up with a lean & mean executable version of Forrest, 
> depending on Ant already being installed. If what remains of Centipede 
> inside Forrest can't support this, we have some cleanup to do.
> 
> And if we want to provide a live webapp version for local development, 
> and Tomcat isn't lightweight enough to embed inside Forrest, why not use 

> Jetty?
> 
> </Steven>
> -- 
> Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
> Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
> stevenn@outerthought.org                      stevenn@apache.org
> 

> ForwardSourceID:NT00087342