Return-Path: 
 <forrest-dev-return-2857-apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 78869 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2002 10:34:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:forrest-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 78855 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2002 10:34:35 -0000
Received: from mail.hospitable.be (HELO relay.hospitable.be) (212.35.122.81)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Oct 2002 10:34:35 -0000
Received: from bert-dell.vankets.com (unknown [212.71.5.10])
	by relay.hospitable.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44FEA1744
	for <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:32:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20021028112942.03af61d0@mail.visitronics.be>
X-Sender: postmaster.vankets@mail.visitronics.be
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:31:06 +0100
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
From: Bert Van Kets <bert@vankets.com>
Subject: Re: New Apache XML Site! :-)
In-Reply-To: <3DBD074D.9050000@outerthought.org>
References: <3DB968F8.5070609@apache.org>
 <5.1.1.6.0.20021028100133.07f77560@mail.visitronics.be>
 <5.1.1.6.0.20021028101420.03af5c58@mail.visitronics.be>
 <20021028093304.GC3444@expresso.localdomain>
 <5.1.1.6.0.20021028103609.034b2de0@mail.visitronics.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords: 

Got ye! ;-)

What about the trial version of Webtrends?  That is, if you are doing a 
single run of course?  Otherwise it would be too expensive.
It supports gziped log files on ftp.

Bert

At 10:45 28/10/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>>>I'll try and make a browser usage analysis for the month of september. I 
>>>would be using analog or webalizer - does anyone else has killer tips 
>>>for log analyzers?
>
>we're talking about 1.5 GB of gzipped logfiles for the month of september 
>alone
>
>grep could do the job, but I plan on doing that log analysis only once, so 
>I need a more comprehensive tool than grep :-)
>
></Steven>
>--
>Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
>Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
>stevenn@outerthought.org                      stevenn@apache.org