Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <3DBE4E53.8070607@outerthought.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:01:07 +0100
From: Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org>
Organization: Outerthought
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Apache XML Site! :-)
References: <3DB968F8.5070609@apache.org>
	<5.1.1.6.0.20021028100133.07f77560@mail.visitronics.be>
	<5.1.1.6.0.20021028101420.03af5c58@mail.visitronics.be>
	<20021028093304.GC3444@expresso.localdomain>
	<3DBD04B0.4050009@outerthought.org>  <3DBE2CCA.10006@outerthought.org>
 <1035879330.2524.8723.camel@ighp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: O

David Crossley wrote:

> As with all statistics, we need to treat them with care.
> 
> Perhaps it would be better if we each analysed the September
> log files from our own webservers and pooled the results.
> 
> I think it would be dangerous to base any decision upon
> one day from www.apache.org site, especially when Forrest
> aims to have broader scope.

Of course, but Apache logs seem like the correct target audience to me. 
The idea _is_ to support Apache websites amongst others, not?

That being said, here are some browser stats from our .org website - 
oktober until now:

Program started at Tue-29-Oct-2002 04:04.
Analysed requests from Tue-01-Oct-2002 00:00 to Tue-29-Oct-2002 03:48 
(28.16 days).

Successful requests: 43,687
Average successful requests per day: 1,551
Successful requests for pages: 5,682
Average successful requests for pages per day: 201
Failed requests: 839
Redirected requests: 1,255
Distinct files requested: 125
Distinct hosts served: 1,387
Unwanted logfile entries: 8,191
Data transferred: 116.535 megabytes
Average data transferred per day: 4.138 megabytes

no.:  reqs: pages: browser
---: -----: -----: -------
   1: 31151:  2644: MSIE
    : 20691:  1754:   MSIE/6
    : 10326:   869:   MSIE/5
    :   134:    21:   MSIE/4
   2:  1343:  1343: Java1.4.0_01-ea
   3:  6062:   677: Mozilla
    :  5725:   635:   Mozilla/1
    :   250:    23:   Mozilla/0
   4:   820:   383: Googlebot
    :   820:   383:   Googlebot/2
   5:  1255:   116: Netscape
    :   675:    81:   Netscape/4
    :   572:    35:   Netscape/6
   6:   520:   100: Netscape (compatible)
   7:   806:    78: Galeon
    :   806:    78:   Galeon/1
   8:   459:    67: Konqueror
    :   459:    67:   Konqueror/3
   9:   437:    55: Opera
    :   404:    52:   Opera/6
    :    33:     3:   Opera/5
  10:    86:    21: TurnitinBot
    :    86:    21:   TurnitinBot/1
  11:    51:    17: FAST-WebCrawler
    :    51:    17:   FAST-WebCrawler/3
  12:    22:    17: Internet Explore 5.x
  13:    75:    15: MarcoPolo
  14:    50:    15: polybot
    :    50:    15:   polybot/1
  15:    74:    15: Xenu Link Sleuth 1.2d
  16:    33:    13: larbin_2.6.2 larbin2.6.2@unspecified.mail
  17:    11:    11: Java1.3.1
  18:    56:    10: ia_archiver
  19:    17:     8: larbin_2.6.2 viktor@nagytestver.hu
  20:    72:     8: MSProxy
    :    72:     8:   MSProxy/2
    :   201:    55: [not listed: 37 browsers]


Gee - that's much less traffic than apache.org :-)

Java1.4.0_01-ea is me stresstesting using JMeter, so that one doesn't 
count. Netscape 4 comes in at approx. 1.6%. Unfortunately, for ot.net, I 
have no browser stats available.

If I find a nice way of running an entire month of loganalysis on 
Daedalus, I'll post again.

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
stevenn@outerthought.org                      stevenn@apache.org