Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <3DBD00CF.50906@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:18:07 +0100
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicolaken@apache.org>
Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Apache XML Site! :-)
References: <3DB968F8.5070609@apache.org>
 <5.1.1.6.0.20021028100133.07f77560@mail.visitronics.be>
 <3DBCFF36.6030703@outerthought.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: O


Steven Noels wrote:
> Bert Van Kets wrote:
> 
>> I just tested with NS4.79 on Win2K Server and had no problems.
> 
> 
> Under Linux (and other Unixes?), it is possible to use some pages as a 
> browser crasher with NS4+. David can confirm this.

I think it's the javascript for the snail trail on top.
Let's just remove it for now if it stops the crashs.

> I agree with your position that the NS4 version should not be visually 
> identical, but we cannot afford to host a browser-crashing version of a 
> site on apache.org
> 
> Maybe we should do some more formal browsertesting. I have a Netscape 4 
> on Linux to offer (David too, I presume) - what we might need is some 
> other Unix-dialects (Solaris, Irix and HP/UX) and Macs, I guess.

Well, we had already done the testing but I agree that it should be 
formailzed better.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------