Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 31085 invoked by uid 500); 25 Sep 2002 08:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 31076 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2002 08:53:10 -0000 Received: from relay.flagship.ru (213.221.9.5) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Sep 2002 08:53:10 -0000 Received: from POSTMAN.flagship.ru (postman.flagship.ru [213.221.9.130]) by relay.flagship.ru (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g8P8rLH12444 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:53:21 +0400 (MSD) Received: by postman.flagship.ru with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:53:29 +0400 Message-ID: From: Piroumian Konstantin To: "'forrest-dev@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: XHTML 2.0 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:53:29 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: > From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:ivelin@apache.org] > > Read this today: > > http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-xhtml/index.html > > > It only sounds wise to me for Forrest to become an early adopter. +1 Looks very similar to the document-v11 format, so why invent the wheel? Schema-DTD masters, what would you say? Konstantin > > XForms is already addressed in C2.1 to a certain extent. > Having XLink, XInclude also in C2.1 makes XHTML 2.0 an even > more logical > choice. > > > -=Ivelin=- > > >