forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ivelin Ivanov" <ive...@apache.org>
Subject Re: XHTML 2.0
Date Sat, 28 Sep 2002 15:36:04 GMT

Ross,

I followed the original thread, but did not want to participate until I read
and understood the XHTML 2.0 spec.

My message should be taken as a personal opinion in addition to everything
else that you brought up with Nicola.

Cheers,

Ivelin


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Gardler" <rgardler@wkwyw.net>
To: <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0


> Piroumian Konstantin wrote:
> >>From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:ivelin@apache.org]
> >>
> >>Read this today:
> >>
> >>http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-xhtml/index.html
> >>
> >>
> >>It only sounds wise to me for Forrest to become an early adopter.
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Looks very similar to the document-v11 format, so why invent the wheel?
> >
> > Schema-DTD masters, what would you say?
>
> Forgive me if this has allready been said in this thread (I've been
> elsewhere for quite a while):
>
> Nicola Ken brought this up some time ago and he listed the XHTML modules
> that he felt provide Document DTD "equivalence". This prompted quite a
> discussion and, if I remember correctly there was only one problem that
> remained unresolved - that of the removal of <title>
>
> Anyway see his initial ideas post at
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=102909917505608&w=2
>
> The whole thread is at
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102892953700005&r=1&w=2
>
> For what its worth I am +1 for adopting XHTML2, although the loss of
> <title> concerns me (see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=forrest-dev&m=102914073227604&w=2 for my
> reasoning)
>
> Ross
>
> >
> > Konstantin
> >
> >
> >>XForms is already addressed in C2.1 to a certain extent.
> >>Having XLink, XInclude also in C2.1 makes XHTML 2.0 an even
> >>more logical
> >>choice.
> >>
> >>
> >>-=Ivelin=-
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>


Mime
View raw message