Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79212 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2002 12:03:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79161 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 12:03:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aisa?2nd.aisa) (194.184.10.204) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 12:03:00 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([192.4.0.103]) by aisa_2nd.aisa (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) with SMTP id C1256C13.0043D520; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:20:54 +0200 Message-ID: <3D57A3D1.6020908@apache.org> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:02:25 +0200 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: XHTML2 I have read it and I like it... GO READ IT! References: <3D5437D1.5070202@apache.org> <1029086921.10286.87.camel@yum> <3D56CE82.6070406@apache.org> <1029143616.10740.190.camel@yum> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: Bruno Dumon wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, Nicola. > > When I was writing my message I was thinking about pure documentation. > > However, it seems that the forrest dtd should be more some kind of > intermediate format between the content sources and the actual > presentation. In that case, I think that it urgently needs more > flexibility and features, and html is then of course the logical and > appropriate choice. Yes. General documentation can be written directly via this dtd, and also general content can use this, but more specific DTDs can simply use this in some parts (see faq and howto DTDs) or simply use it as an intermediate format (JavadocXML). > BTW, as for html 4 and the deprecated presentation markup: it was > already removed in the strict dtd, which is the recommended one. Of > course xhtml2 is still cleaner in that regard. Yup :-) > On Sun, 2002-08-11 at 22:52, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >>Bruno Dumon wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 23:44, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: >>> >>> >>>>XHTML2 working draft >>>>http://www.w3c.org/TR/2002/WD-xhtml2-20020805/Overview.html#toc >>>> >>> > [big snip] -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------