Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 95075 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2002 14:54:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 95049 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2002 14:54:18 -0000 Received: from otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (157.193.121.51) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jul 2002 14:54:18 -0000 Received: from outerthought.org ([192.168.123.104]) by otsrv1.iic.rug.ac.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6VEsJj24074 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:54:19 +0200 Message-ID: <3D47FA1B.5060800@outerthought.org> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:54:19 +0200 From: Steven Noels Organization: Outerthought User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: What is Forrest's Focus References: <003101c2389f$2d9af240$ac00a8c0@Gabriel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 458 Berin Loritsch wrote: >>The FW: in your subject worries me: I don't want to know where the >>original remark originates from... > > > > I accidentally sent it to forrest-dev-subscribe@xml.apache.org. I > forwarded it from my sent items. My email client foobarred the > original post. being overly anxious then :-) > > Ok. Sounds good. BTW, you can thank Ben Franklin (on the US $100 bill) > for the quote. All �/EUROs over here :-) -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center stevenn@outerthought.org stevenn@apache.org