Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-forrest-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 37491 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2002 18:31:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 37482 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2002 18:31:27 -0000 Received: from mail-4.tiscali.it (HELO mail.tiscali.it) (195.130.225.150) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2002 18:31:27 -0000 Received: from apache.org (62.10.50.24) by mail.tiscali.it (6.5.026) id 3D3598B3000FD24F; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:31:30 +0200 Message-ID: <3D385AEF.9090602@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:31:11 +0200 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avalon Developers List CC: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Xdocs Standards References: <004701c22f51$492d30b0$ac00a8c0@Gabriel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 195 Berin Loritsch wrote: >>From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:nicolaken@apache.org] >> >>Then join forrest-dev@xml.apache.org . >>Libre generates stuff automatically as part of the gen >>process, so that >>it can enhance book.xml-like stuff. > > Yet another mailing list?!? > > I have to unsubscribe from some others first.... hehehe >>In which way "Libre markup is ugly"? > > It looks like a programming language marked up in XML as > opposed to the genuine simplicity of book/project style > declarations. > > Can't Libre be altered to work with project.xml (what is > in the menu.xml files)? I don't see what project.xml has that is so cool, except different markup names... I'm ccing forrest list so that our libre experts can reply better than me. BTW, what about changing tags so that we get nearer to the new Anakia Maven format? For example, have a instead of link, as XHTML does. This can help authors write in XHTML and convert to our DTD, or use XHTML editors or the browsers' edit mode more easily. This goes along with easier usage for long time HTML people and getting nearer to the modularized XHTML that was proposed. Thoughts? -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------